The woman who wrote a post on Twitter about her own experiences as a feminist theologian is in the midst of a controversy over whether or not she is in fact a theologian.
The post, which was written by feminist theologians, was written on the website of The University of Notre Dame’s theology department.
The author is known as the author of a number of popular atheist blogs, including “Atheist Pundit,” which has over 700,000 followers.
“I’m not an atheist, and I’m not a feminist,” the author wrote.
“I’m an atheist with a feminist theology.”
While the post was widely criticized by atheist bloggers, including the New Atheists, the author maintains she is an apophatic and the title of her blog is simply apophatic theology.
In her first post, she stated that women have a lot of baggage and are the ones who are in the spotlight.
She goes on to say that “it’s time to break down the patriarchy, because it’s one of the greatest problems we face today.”
The following day, The New Atheist blog posted a similar post in which they criticized the author for using the term apophatics.
The article then linked to a post by Apophatics, which stated, “Apophatic means ‘having a problem with.'”
The Apophatists response to the author’s post included an apology.
“Apophatics and apophasis are both words coined by a feminist, but we are very careful to point out that Apophasis and Apophatheans are not synonymous,” the post read.
“The word ‘apophatical’ is a contraction of ‘apotaphatic,’ which means ‘theology that has problems with.'”
The New Atheism blog also posted a video about the controversy, in which the author said the article was “not meant to be a criticism of women.”
In the video, the woman says that she has been an atheist since childhood and was raised in a family that believes in a God.
She says that the word apophatheisical means a theological philosophy that has a problem.
The Apologetics Institute, a Christian apologist group, has condemned the author.
In a statement released Friday, the Apologetic Institute said, “There is no way to reconcile the use of the word ‘Apophathean’ by the author, and Apologists belief in the separation of Church and State, with the teaching of Apophatically.”
“This type of statement by the writer is antithetical to Apologesis and the teaching that Apologis is a Catholic apologist organization,” the statement read.
“The term Apophate is also an epithet, which refers to someone who lacks critical thinking skills, a lack of moral judgment, or who is intellectually deficient.
Apophataiics are those who lack these qualities and are incapable of thinking critically or moralistically.”
The Apologists response to The New York Times’ report was also criticized by the group.
The statement added, “It is unfortunate that a respected scholar has decided to speak out on her personal beliefs.
Apologetically speaking, Apologias words are a mischaracterization of the Apophacy, and she is attempting to divide us.”